215. Capitalist+Patriarchy Robs Right to Regenerate
Life from Mother Earth and Her Children, formally and legally
Corporate
Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
Indiana
farmer must pay agribusiness giant $84,000 for patent infringement
- Jacob Chamberlain, staff writer
บรรษัทชนะ: ศาลสูงสุด บอกว่า มอนซานโตมี (สิทธิ์) “ควบคุมผลผลิตแห่งชีวิต”
เกษตรกร
อินเดียนา จะต้องจ่ายธุรกิจเกษตรยักษ์ $84,000
สำหรับการละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์
-เจค็อบ แชมเบอร์เลน
ดรุณี
ตันติวิรมานนท์ แปล
The
U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday in favor of biotech giant Monsanto, ordering
Indiana farmer Vernon Hugh Bowman, 75, to pay Monsanto more than $84,000 for
patent infringement for using second generation Monsanto seeds purchased second
hand—a ruling which will have broad implications for the ownership of 'life'
and farmers' rights in the future.
ศาลสูงสุดสหรัฐฯ
ตัดสินเมื่อวันจันทร์ เข้าข้างยักษ์ใหญ่ไบโอเทค มอนซานโต, สั่งให้เกษตรกรอินเดียนา
เวอร์นอน ฮิวจ์ บาวแมน, อายุ 75, ให้จ่ายเงินแก่มอนซานโตกว่า
$84,000 โทษฐานละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์
เพราะใช้เมล็ดรุ่นลูกของเมล็ดพันธุ์มอนซานโตที่ซื้อต่อมาอีกที—คำตัดสินที่จะมีนัยสำคัญต่อความหมายของการเป็นเจ้าของของ
“ชีวิต” และ สิทธิของเกษตรกรในอนาคต.
Indiana grain farmer Vernon Hugh Bowman walks
past the US Supreme Court on February 19, 2013 in Washington (AFP/File, Mandel
Ngan)
In
the case, Bowman had purchased soybean seeds from a grain elevator—where seeds
are cheaper than freshly engineered Monsanto GE (genetically engineered) seeds
and typically used for animal feed rather than for crops. The sources of the
seeds Bowman purchased were mixed and were not labeled. However, some were
"Roundup Ready" patented Monsanto seeds.
ในกรณีนี้,
บาวแมนได้ซื้อเมล็ดถั่วเหลืองจากโรงเก็บเมล็ดพันธุ์แห่งหนึ่ง—ที่ขายเมล็ดในราคาถูกกว่าเมล็ดจีเอ็มมอนซานโตผลิตสดๆ
และที่ปกติจะใช้เป็นอาหารสัตว์มากกว่าปลูกพืช.
แหล่งที่บาวแมนซื้อ ผสมปนเปเมล็ดต่างๆ และไม่ได้ติดฉลาก. แต่ บางเมล็ดเป็น “ราวด์อัพ เร็ดดี้”
ที่เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมอนซานโต.
The
Supreme Court Justices, who gave Monsanto a warm reception from the start,
ruled that Bowman had broken the law because he planted seeds which naturally
yielded from the original patented seed products—Monsanto's policies prohibit
farmers from saving or reusing seeds from Monsanto born crops.
ตุลาการศาลสูงสุด,
ผู้ให้การต้อนรับอันอบอุ่นต่อมอนซานโตตั้งแต่เริ่ม, ตัดสินว่า บาวแมนได้แหกกฎหมาย
เพราะเขาได้ใช้เมล็ดในการเพาะปลูก
ซึ่งให้ผลผลิตจากผลิตภัณฑ์เมล็ดที่แรกเริ่มถูกบัญญัติลิขสิทธิ์—นโยบายมอนซานโต
ห้ามเกษตรกรเก็บรักษา หรือ ใช้ใหม่ เมล็ดพันธุ์ที่ออกมาจากพืชดังกล่าว. (เพราะพืชต้นนั้นเป็นทาสของมอนซานโต ที่เกษตรกร “ซื้อยืม” มาทำงาน/หรือ
“ออกลูก” ให้ขายในรุ่นนี้เท่านั้น...ถ้าเก็บลูกทาสให้ออกหลาน หลานนั้นก็ยังคงเป็น “ทาส” ของมอนซานโต...เกษตรกรไม่มีสิทธิ์ใช้
ลูกทาส หลานทาส ... ความเป็นทาสของเมล็ดจีเอ็ม ต่อ มอนซานโต เป็นชั่วฟ้าดินสลาย
และด้วยห่วงโซ่นี้ เกษตรกรก็กลายเป็นทาส ชั่วฟ้าดินสลายต่อ มอนซานโต หรือ
บรรษัทใดๆ ที่ผลิตเมล็ดจีเอ็ม)
Farmers
who use Monsanto's seeds are forced to buy the high priced new seeds every
year.
เกษตรกรที่ใช้เมล็ดของมอนซานโต
ถูกบังคับให้ต้องซื้อเมล็ดใหม่ในราคาสูงลิ่วทุกปี.
Ahead
of the expected ruling, Debbie Barker, Program Director for Save Our Seeds
(SOS), and George Kimbrell, staff attorney for Center for Food Safety (CFS),
asked in an op-ed earlier this year, "Should anyone, or any corporation,
control a product of life?":
ก่อนหน้าคำพิพากษาดั่งคาด,
เด็บบี้ บาร์เกอร์, ผอ โครงการรักษาเมล็ดพันธุ์ของเรา (SOS), และ ยอร์จ คิมแบรล, อัยการสำหรับ ศูนย์อาหารปลอดภัย (CFS), ตั้งคำถามใน op-ed เมื่อต้นปีนี้, “สมควรหรือไม่ที่
คนหนึ่งคนใด หรือ บรรษัทหนึ่งบรรษัทใด จะมีอำนาจควบคุมผลผลิตแห่งชีวิต?”
Bowman
vs. Monsanto Co. will be decided based on the court's interpretation of a
complex web of seed and plant patent law, but the case also reflects something
much more basic: Should anyone, or any corporation, control a product of life?
คู่ชก บาวแมน ปะทะ มอนซานโต
จะถูกตัดสิน บนฐานของการตีความของศาล ถึงโยงใยอันซับซ้อนของเมล็ดพันธุ์ และ
กฎหมายลิขสิทธิ์เหนือพืช, แต่กรณีนี้ ยังสะท้อนบางอย่างที่เป็นพื้นฐานยิ่งกว่า: สมควรหรือไม่ ที่ผู้ใด, หรือ
บรรษัทใด, จะมีอำนาจเหนือ ผลผลิตแห่งชีวิต?
[Monsanto's]
logic is troubling to many who point out that it is the nature of seeds and all
living things, whether patented or not, to replicate. Monsanto's claim that it
has rights over a self-replicating natural product should raise concern. Seeds,
unlike computer chips, for example, are essential to life. If people are denied
a computer chip, they don't go hungry. If people are denied seeds, the potential
consequences are much more threatening.
ตรรกะของมอนซานโต
ทำให้หลายคนลำบาก พวกเขาชี้ว่า มันเป็นธรรมชาติของเมล็ดและสิ่งมีชีวิตทั้งมวล,
ไม่ว่าจะถูกประทับจองลิขสิทธิ์ หรือ ไม่, ที่จะผลิตซ้ำตัวเอง. ข้ออ้างของมอนซานโตที่ว่า
มันมีสิทธิ์เหนือการผลิตตนซ้ำของผลผลิตธรรมชาติ ควรจะเป็นเรื่องน่ากังวลห่วงใย. เมล็ดพันธุ์, ไม่เหมือนชิปคอมพิวเตอร์,
ยกตัวอย่าง, เป็นเนื้อแท้ของชีวิต.
หากประชาชนถูกปฏิเสธไม่ให้เข้าถึงชิปคอมพิวเตอร์, พวกเขาจะไม่อดอยากหิวโหย. หากประชาชนถูกปฏิเสธเมล็ดพันธุ์,
ผลพวงที่อาจเกิดขึ้นได้จะเป็นภัยคุกคามมากยิ่ง.
Bowman
had argued that he was respecting his contract with Monsanto, purchasing
directly from them each year, but couldn't afford Monsanto's high prices for
his riskier late season crops. Bowman's defense argued that Monsanto's patent
was "exhausted" through the process of natural seed reproduction and
no longer applied to Bowman's second generation seeds.
บาวแมนได้โต้แย้งว่า
เขาเคารพข้อสัญญาผูกพันกับมอนซานโต, ด้วยการซื้อโดยตรงจากพวกเขาทุกปี,
แต่ไม่สามารถแบกภาระราคาที่สูงในพืชปลายฤดูที่มีความเสี่ยงสูงกว่า. ทนายของบาวแมน โต้แย้งว่า
ลิขสิทธิ์ของมอนซานโตได้ “หมดกำลัง” ผ่านกระบวนการผลิตซ้ำโดยธรรมชาติของเมล็ดเอง
และ ไม่สามารถจะใช้ข้อผูกพันดังกล่าว กับเมล็ดพันธุ์รุ่นลูก (ในครอบครอง)
ของบาวแมน.
“If
they don’t want me to go to the elevator and buy that grain," Bowman had
stated, "then Congress should pass a law saying you can’t do it."
“หากพวกเขาไม่ต้องการให้ผมไปที่โรงเก็บเมล็ดพันธุ์
และซื้อธัญพืชที่นั่น”, บาวแมนกล่าว, “สภาคองเกรสควรจะออกกฎหมายที่บอกว่า
คุณทำอย่างนั้นไม่ได้”.
The
Center for Food Safety released a report in February which shows three
corporations control more than half of the global commercial seed market.
ศูนย์อาหารปลอดภัย
แถลงรายงานในเดือนกุมภาพันธ์ ที่แสดงให้เห็น
สามบรรษัทที่มีอำนาจควบคุมตลาดเมล็ดพันธุ์พาณิชย์ในโลกกว่าครึ่ง.
As
a result, from 1995-2011 the average cost to plant 1 acre of soybeans rose
325%.
ผลคือ, ระหว่าง ปี 1995-2011
(2538-2554) ต้นทุนในการเพาะปลูกถั่วเหลือง หนึ่งเอเคอร์ (๔-๕
ไร่???) พุ่งทวีคูณถึง 325%.
As
AP reports, more than 90 percent of American soybean farms use Monsanto's
"Roundup Ready" seeds, which first came on the market in 1996.
ดังรายงาน AP, กว่า 90% ของฟาร์มถั่วเหลืองอเมริกัน ใช้เมล็ด
“ราวด์อัพ เร็ดดี” ของมอนซานโต, ซึ่งออกสู่ตลาดเป็นครั้งแรกในปี 1996.
Vandana
Shiva, an expert on seed patents and their effects on farmers around the world,
wrote recently:
วันทนา ศิวะ,
ผู้เชี่ยวชาญด้านเมล็ดพันธุ์ลิขสิทธิ์ และ ผลกระทบของพวกมันต่อเกษตรกรทั่วโลก,
เขียนเมื่อเร็วๆ นี้:
Monsanto’s
concentrated control over the seed sector in India as well as across the world
is very worrying. This is what connects farmers’ suicides in India to Monsanto
vs Percy Schmeiser in Canada, to Monsanto vs Bowman in the US, and to farmers
in Brazil suing Monsanto for $2.2 billion for unfair collection of royalty.
การรวมศูนย์กระจุกตัวควบคุมภาคเมล็ดพันธุ์ในอินเดีย
ตลอดจน ทั่วโลก ของมอนซานโต เป็นเรื่องน่ากังวลอย่างยิ่ง. นี่เป็นจุดเชื่อมการฆ่าตัวตายของ เกษตรกรในอินเดีย
กับ คู่กรณี มอนซานโต กับ เปอร์ซี ชไมเซอร์ ในแคนาดา, กับกรณี บาวแมนในสหรัฐฯ, และกับการที่บราซิลฟ้องร้อง มอนซานโต เป็นเงิน $2.2 โทษฐานเรียกเก็บค่าลิขสิทธิ์ที่ไม่เป็นธรรม.
Through
patents on seed, Monsanto has become the “Life Lord” of our planet, collecting
rents for life’s renewal from farmers, the original breeders.
ด้วยการประทับลิขสิทธิ์ใส่เมล็ดพันธุ์,
มอนซานโตได้กลายเป็น “เจ้าชีวิต” ในพิภพของเรา,
ด้วยการเก็บค่าเช่าจากกระบวนการงอกชีวิตใหม่จากเกษตรกร,
ผู้เป็นคนแรกดั้งเดิมที่ผสมพันธุ์พืช.
This work is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
Published on
Monday, May 13, 2013 by Common Dreams
Holygeezer
• 7 hours ago
Anyone who believes in the USA legal
system is an insane fool. I no longer recognize our so-called rule of law. It
is a criminal enterprise. I consider myself an outlaw now in order to live in
an ethical manner. Our whole system has been hijacked by the criminally insane.
Good luck to our future. There is no way to fight this madness within the
system. I am so glad I never had children.
And by the way, who the fuck ever
came up with the concept that you could patent plants in any way shape or form.
Man sure the fuck didn't invent or create plants, they were here long before
our sorry species set foot upon this precious planet. For a species that
considers itself intelligent, it sure the hell ain't.
MountainMan23
> Holygeezer • 5 hours ago
And
by the way, who came up with the concept that you could patent plants in any
way shape or form.
..
or make certain plants illegal ..
David
Ventura > MountainMan23 • 3 hours ago
You
don't wanna mess with them major seed producers man, they're businessman after
all.
Siouxrose
> Holygeezer • 6 hours ago
I'm
with you on this one! It's because the Supreme Court is a bunch of Disaster
Capitalist neo-cons who side with profit over every sane, just, sacred, or
humane thing, right, or rite!
Ptolemean
> Holygeezer • 5 hours ago
I
always cringe when I hear the phrase 'rule of law' postulated as if it
supposedly represents some virtuous concept - every tyrant and unjust
government has always ruled by their law. Contrarily, I like the postulate that
the wise would live the same lives though every law were abolished. The value
(or not) of laws is found in the spirit of its intent, which should always be
rooted in the greatest compassion for the highest truth and in the highest
reason for the greatest wisdom of nature. Instead, law today serves at the
convenience of power, for the expediency of power's intent. So YES, anyone who
believes in power's self-serving rule of law is foolishly naive respecting the
nature of law.
David
Ventura > Ptolemean • 3 hours ago
The
fetish of power.
theinitiate
> Ptolemean • 3 hours ago
....and
who to hell is going to follow that law... is this farmer going to pay???? They
will probably try to take his farm if he doesn't.... I say, all his friends
should get together and make a stand... defend him and his farm.... and hec...
i'm not even a gun person.... how else are we going to fight this.... hope if
he decides to flip them off and not pay.... they just leave him alone.... I
can't even imagine the mind set of a company like that expecting to get 84,00
dollars forked over to them .... for nothing.... I'd really like to know what
this farmer does next....are we all going to swallow this "rule of
law" or what..... just like if they pass fracking in NY .... right where I
live.... I'll tell you one thing.... ain't happening in my area..... they'll
have to cart me off to jail....
SophiaHi
> theinitiate • 2 hours ago
If
this farmer does not go organic, whatever is written about it, is not worth the
virtual ink.
cuja1
> Holygeezer • 4 hours ago
We have had no legal system since the
Supreme Court gave Bush the right to be president. I use marigold seeds from
new plants for the next year so now we may pay a fine for that. Wonder how much
money changed hands?The Supreme Court Justices are as crooked as the rest of
the legal system.
SophiaHi
> cuja1 • 2 hours ago
Thank
You for reiterating this important fact. It was in the year 2000 that I created
a bumper sticker stating: "Forget 'Elections' - The ONLY VOTE You have is
AT THE CASH REGISTER'
Giovanna
Lepore > Holygeezer • 6 hours ago
The
entire system is and has been a criminal system. What we are witnessing is the
complete reversal--perversion--of our place in the great Web of Life. Western
dualistic thinking has placed man in this predicament. Makes one wonder what we
must mean by "intelligent". All that grey matter gone to waste.
Ted
M > Holygeezer • 2 hours ago
"There
is no way to fight this madness within the system."
You're
absolutely right, Hg. Not within the system.
janicevalverde
> Holygeezer • an hour ago
agree
with every word and sentiment here. . . except for being glad about not being a
parent. . . my only source of joy and hope when i consider the future of our
planet and our coutnry
SophiaHi
• 6 hours ago
You may have heard it before - any
times - but it can't be reiterated enough times. A routine from the funniest
Bright Bulb America ever had the honor to serve as 'home'.
George
Carlin:
"Forget
the politicians. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you
have freedom of choice . . . you don’t. You have no choice. You have owners.
They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own,
and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought, and paid for the
Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls, they got the judges in
their back pockets and they own all the big media companies, so they control
just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the
balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying . . . lobbying, to
get what they want . . . Well, we know what they want. They want more for
themselves and less for everybody else, but I’ll tell you what they don’t want
. . . they don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated
people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that . . . that
doesn’t help them.
That’s against their interests.
That’s right. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a
kitchen table and think about how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that
threw them overboard 30 fuckin' years ago. They don’t want that. You know what
they want? They want obedient workers . . . Obedient workers, people who are
just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork. And just dumb
enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower
pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime and vanishing
pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it, and now they’re coming
for your Social Security money. They want your retirement money. They want it back so they
can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street, and you know something?
They’ll get it . . . they’ll get it all from you sooner or later cause they own
this fuckin' place. It’s a big club and you ain't in it. You and I are not in
The big club. By the way, it’s the same big club they use to beat you over the
head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating
you over the head with their media telling you what to believe, what to think
and what to buy. The table has tilted folks. The game is rigged and nobody
seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. Good honest hard-working people . . .
white collar, blue collar it doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on. Good
honest hard-working people continue, these are people of modest means . . .
continue to elect these rich cocksuckers who don’t give a fuck about you. They don’t care about you at all . . . at all
. . . at all, and nobody seems to notice.
Nobody seems to care. That’s what the
owners count on. The fact that Americans will probably remain willfully
ignorant of the big red, white and blue dick that’s being jammed up their
assholes everyday, because the owners of this country know the truth. It’s
called the American Dream cause you have to be asleep to believe it..."
see
more
EthanAllen1
> SophiaHi • 2 hours ago
Sophia!!! That's one of my favorite George Carlin
rants.....cudos to you for posting it here. The man told the truth better than
most, and made us laugh at our lazy-minded complacency. Indeed, we do have to be asleep to believe in
the gingoism that is branded as "the American Dream."
SophiaHi
> EthanAllen1 • an hour ago
I
consider it the most painful truth wrapped into one of the most hilarious
albeit disturbing rants the world has ever heard of or seen. Statues are usually reserved for the worst of
the worst. But, imagine a George Carlin
Statue where Ms. Liberty was standing, because Ms. Liberty doesn't live here
anymore.
George would be a much better statue
at that, too. Equipped with a bright torch and a Marble slab that reads: 'Don't
let them get You by the balls.'
frigate
• 7 hours ago
Presidential,
Congressional and Supreme Court rulings should be subject to recall by popular
referendum. Otherwise it is not democracy, but dictatorship or
"republic" as Republicans like to call it.
Mirl
Tanker > frigate • 7 hours ago
The
US, INC. was always a republic and never a democracy. See Switzerland for as
close to a democracy you will see on this planet.
frigate
> Mirl Tanker • 5 hours ago
True.
Why do they still call US a democracy?
Ed
Ciaccio > frigate • 4 hours ago
Only
imperial propagandists and shills, and those in total self-delusion and
complete denial still call the U.S. a "democracy". It is an arrogant,
murderous Empire.
braithwa842
> Ed Ciaccio • 38 minutes ago
Unfortunately,
you are speaking about the majority.
truthoutnow
> frigate • 4 hours ago
Recite
the pledge of Allegiance "and to the Republic, for which it stands."
janicevalverde
> frigate • an hour ago
we
have not had a representative democracy is quite some time.
MountainMan23
• 7 hours ago
Maybe
it's time for ALL fifty states to secede.
.. just a thought ..
Mirl
Tanker > MountainMan23 • 7 hours ago
It's
time for the people to withdraw consent. Refuse to participate any longer. Yes,
there will be consequences. But to sit back and do nothing will create a hell
no one can imagine. They have your food and they are coming for your water.
Guaranteed.
pakilolo
> Mirl Tanker • 6 hours ago
For
people to withdraw consent they will have to turn off their TVs. They will have
to get off their dead ass.
theinitiate
> pakilolo • 22 minutes ago
absofreakinlutely....
and .... give up a lot of shit... but I say it is time to stop giving away our
freedom and our kids futures... take back the environment and lets create our
own economy, cottage industry, help those who do not have... sharing
communities and bring in those who are in need.... how would that be worse than
what we have now?? All we do, is work to allow the top to get rich off our
effort and creativity..... they take and take and take....
drone1
> Mirl Tanker • 6 hours ago
this is the first step, right here.
stop playing their damned game. we can't and won't fight a system we still see
as legitimate. at this point, we have
the same rights of self-defense as any other occupied people.
cuja1
> drone1 • 4 hours ago
Nothing
has been legal here, ... the illegal Europeans illegally invaded this land and
stole it from the natives. Freedom is only if you do has the elite says,
theinitiate
> Mirl Tanker • 24 minutes ago
This
is what I have been waiting to hear.... let's go for it....
Ando
Arike > MountainMan23 • 5 hours ago
Who owns this evil monster of a corporation?
Who's on the board of directors? Who are the major shareholders? What are their
names, where do they live, where do their children go to school? This info
needs to be published widely.
We need to stop letting the 1% hide
behind their legal masks, i.e. their "legal person" corporations,
which have all the rights of flesh-and-blood people (and even more) but none of
the responsibilities. Make these scum pay; out them for their crimes; harass
them and make their lives miserable. Obviously, they have no naturally
occurring conscience -- so one must be supplied via the public.
patricia
spinazzola > Ando Arike • 4 hours ago
Here
you go:
http://www.monsanto.com/whowea...
carol
peacocke byram > Ando Arike • 4 hours ago
I'd
love to see those 1% mofos get doxed. But by now they've probably bought the
fucking moon and will leave the earth for us once they have sucked it dry and
killed it. Like any parasite that kills its host.
GrandmaR
> Ando Arike • an hour ago
http://www.monsanto.com/invest...
Click
on the Who We Are tab at the top of the page.
pakilolo
• 6 hours ago
There
is NO justice in the United States. We live in a Corporate controlled world .
They bought our politicians and our courts and our media. They own our seeds
and and our economy. We did not vote for any of this crap.
gardenernorcal
• 7 hours ago
One question when the grain elevator
sold the seed to Bowman did they stipulate it was only for animal feed?
If not, why are not. They are
responsible for selling the seed, and the losses and awards to Monsanto? Mr.
Bowman just bought seed.
Siouxrose
> gardenernorcal • 6 hours ago
Good
point... and question.
CygnusX1isaHole
• 6 hours ago
The
Supreme Court's ruling was unanimous.
From
Reuters:
Justice Elena Kagan wrote ... that
patent exhaustion did not allow a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through
planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission.
If farmers were allowed to do so,
"a patent would plummet in value after the first sale of the first items
containing the invention," Kagan wrote. Such a result would lead to
"less incentive for innovation than Congress wanted," she added.
Keep voting for Democrats if you want
"liberal" justices like Kagan.
tabilosa
> CygnusX1isaHole • 3 hours ago
Just
proof...they all work for the same boss...corporate greed and no rights for the
little people.
cuja1
> CygnusX1isaHole • 4 hours ago
It
doesn't matter if Democrat , Republican, or other, the elite picks whom the
next puppet will be.
Lorna
Paisley > CygnusX1isaHole • 3 hours ago
Republicans
are even worse however.
All
people in government are not to be trusted no matter the party. None care what
happens to the people.
Riverfoam
> Lorna Paisley • 3 hours ago
O
IS the more effective evil.
rosemariejackowski
> CygnusX1isaHole • 6 hours ago
Yes...the D/R voters are at the
bottom of this. Just one more example of people getting what they voted for.
It is time to start thinking of
voters as adults who are capable of critical thinking. The belief that voters
are not responsible infantizes and disrespects them.
gardenernorcal
> CygnusX1isaHole • 2 hours ago
If
only that would ever happen. I await that day. I am not going to live that
long.
I'd
love to see patent's plumment...I'd hold a party.
JohannIvan
• 7 hours ago −
Where
oh where are the Monsanto apologists? Come on now, step forward and proudly
defend Monsanto / GMO as beneficial to mankind.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น